The smokeless cigarette controversy became viral during September of 2009 once the FDA publicized an investigation on smokefree cigarettes and their corresponding nicotine containing solution e liquid determining them as hazardous because they contained toxins viewed as poisonous to humans. The ecig camp fired back by having a recognized research firm to examine the FDA report and the practices utilized to reach their conclusions. This firm discovered the results obtained by the Food and Drug Administration research was invalid because the testing techniques used had been far from those necessary to create these kind of specific determinations.
So now, more than a year after, just what have we discovered relating to the safety of smokeless cigarettes? Well, in simple terms, not a thing has changed. Each side of the controversy still claim their assertions are accurate. In the end, the electric cigarette buyer is still in the dark concerning the safety of the smokeless cigarette. Let’s take a closer look at precisely what we do know.
In the interest of brevity, I won’t go into details about how the electronic cigarette works or how it’s used. It is in simple terms a nicotine delivery system not unlike the doctor prescribed Nicotrol inhaler. It functions by warming and vaporizing a combination of glycerin and nicotine when the user takes a puff from the device. The Food and Drug Administration’s major point of contention (now confirmed wrong through the ancillary scientific study) is the nicotine formulated solution they analyzed included contaminants detrimental to humans. The discussion concerning this aspect is not the issue at hand. The most critical thing to remember would be the fact that the Food and Drug Administration quite possible, if intentional or otherwise, made a most important discovery.
In the United States, most anything we eat or drink has to comply with procedures controlled by a range of government agencies which guarantee our safety and health. We often see goods which were recalled due to the smallest incompliance with proper requirements. So now let’s think about e liquid (the nicotine solution contained in e cigarettes) for a moment. At this time, there’s not guidelines or polices in place overseeing its production, who may manufacture it, how it is stored or even its shelf-life. Essentially, you or I can search on the internet, buy ejuice supplies and begin blending it inside our kitchens with no legal requirements whatsoever. Obviously for personal use this may seem reasonable. Still, I do not know of any comparable product intended for human inhalation which you make for yourself not to mention for mass consumption by providing it for sales on the world-wide-web. Nevertheless this is precisely what several e-juice companies are actually doing.
Please don’t misunderstand me. I’m absolutely not saying that ejuice is unsafe. I’m saying there is a substantial threat that because of poor regulation, a contaminated e juice can in theory wind up in the hands of an electric cigarette user. So now you will most likely consider the e liquid that is manufactured by the e-cigarette companies themselves? Here again, we in essence have a similar scenario. Formulated in many instances in Japan, there isn’t any regulation of any form pertaining to how this e liquid is manufactured. Ultimately, it seems people looking for e liquid need to consider the proverb caveat emptor or “Let the buyer beware”.
So now, more than a year after, exactly what have we discovered relating to the safety of ecigarettes? Well, in simple terms, nothing has changed. Both sides of the debate continue to maintain their statements are correct. In the end, the ecigarette consumer is still in the dark about the safety of the e-cigarette. Why don’t we take a closer look at what specifically we really do know.
In the interest of brevity, I will not go into detail regarding how the electric cigarette functions or how it’s used. It’s essentially a nicotine delivery system not different from the doctor prescribed Nicotrol inhaler. It works by heating and vaporizing a combination of glycerin and nicotine while the user breathes in a puff from the device. The Food and Drug Administration’s principal point of contention (since established mistaken through the 2nd examination) is the nicotine formulated fluid they analyzed included contaminants detrimental to humans. The controversy regarding this aspect is not the issue at hand. The most important thing to note may be the fact that the Food and Drug Administration quite possible, if deliberate or not, made a very important finding.
In the United States, most everything we eat or drink must conform to procedures controlled by a variety of government departments which guarantee our safety and health. We occasionally see products that are recalled due to the slightest incompliance with appropriate requirements. So why don’t we think about e juice (the nicotine product contained in e-cigs) for a moment. Presently, there’s not rules or polices in place overseeing its production, who may make it, how it is stored or even its shelf-life. Basically, you or I can go on the internet, buy eliquid products and begin mixing it inside our garages with no regulation whatsoever. Needless to say for private use this can seem reasonable. Still, I do not know of any comparable product made for human inhalation which you make for yourself not to mention for mass consumption by offering it for sales on the world-wide-web. Nevertheless this is precisely what various e liquid merchants are actually doing.
Please don’t misunderstand me. I am absolutely not stating that e juice is harmful. I am just saying there is a genuine threat that as a result of insufficient regulation, a contaminated eliquid may in theory fall into the hands of an e-cigarette user. Now you will likely think about the e liquid that is produced by the e-cig suppliers themselves? Here once again, we essentially have a similar situation. Produced for the most part in Japan, there is no regulation of any type regarding how this e liquid is produced. In the long run, it seems people looking for e-juice should think about that old saying caveat emptor or “Let the buyer beware”.
Posted in 
Tags: 